Sunday, November 30, 2014

Book vs. Screen Reading




How often do you sit down with a book of your choice, and just read for a half hour or so?  I’m not talking about the common reading or the Aims of Argument, great readings both.  I mean a book you find interesting to the point that you become engrossed.  Do you do that? Did you ever used to do that?  I’m here to urge you to take up, or rediscover, the habit of slow reading.
Thomas Newkirk, an English professor at University of New Hampshire, has written a book on slow reading.

Slow, engrossed reading is not likely to happen when you’re reading on a screen (except possibly the Kindle without the Fire).  Screen reading trains the brain to do many good things such as quickly focusing attention and making decisions about the value or relevance of a web site or on-line article.  Dr. Gary Small, Director of the Memory & Aging Research Center at UCLA, praises the Internet for its ability to train the brains of young and old, developing “neural circuitry that is customized for rapid and incisive spurts of directed concentration.” That’s the good news about screen reading.

But the downside is that the more we train our brains to develop these circuits, the more likely we are to allow the pathways for more traditional learning to lapse and diminish.  I’m talking now about the ability to concentrate for extended periods of time, such as when reading a book.  Even older people who grew up loving books have lost their ability to read deeply.  Nick Carr wrote for The Atlantic magazine an article that resonated with fellow former book worms.  He asked, “Is Google Making Us Stupid?”  In one way, no; it gives us information, in fast, particle form. In another way, yes; it makes us incapable of concentrating our attention.  Now, he says, his concentration drifts after two or three pages. He gets “fidgety, lose[s] the thread, begin[s] looking for something else to do.”  Sound familiar?

Because reading comprehension and people skills are so important for school, work, and full development of human potential, we cannot allow ourselves to become what playwright Richard Foreman describes as “pancake people,” people who are wide with information but thin in knowledge and relationship skills.  The solution is to start training our brains in the art of slow reading. 

My niece Meredith learning to turn the pages.
The benefits of slow reading were reported in a Wall StreetJournal article this September:  better and longer concentration, reduced levels of stress (almost within 6 minutes of opening the book, subjects’ stress level went down), and “deepened ability to think, listen, and empathize.”  Yes, reading, especially good fiction, improves people skills—but only if you allow yourself to enter into the world of the characters and their feelings. And a study by the National Endowment for the Arts similarly found “greater academic, professional, and civic benefits associated with high levels of leisure reading and reading comprehension.” The cause of these benefits remains unexplained, but the correlation has been proven.  Another correlation was found in the National Endowment study between writing scores and reading for fun among high school seniors. On a scale of 0-300, those who read every day averaged 165 (not great, but we are talking average high school writers!) while those who never read averaged 136 (considerably less great) on the writing test. 

While it’s important to exercise and socialize in leisure hours, I think most college students can work in 30 minutes a couple days a week to do an activity that will reward them in so many ways.  So when you have just a tiny block of time to fill, put the phone or tablet away and pull out an interesting and well-written book.  A good choice might be any of the ones that Highland Park High School banned (temporarily) from the senior English lists:  The Glass Castle, The Absolutely True Diary of a Part-Time Indian, or The Art of Racing in the Rain.  What books have made a reader out of you? Do you have recommendations?