Now
that the Rolling Stone has disgraced itself
with shoddy journalism reporting a gang rape at UVA that either did not occur
or occurred quite differently than reported, we have to ask why the story was
initially received as completely credible.
Is it because it fits a pattern of sexual assaults at fraternity parties
across the nation? When my classes read Ross Douthat’s opinion column this fall in which he suggested a correlation
between campus sexual assaults and fraternity culture, most students said he
had no proof, it was just a myth, just a stereotype that gives fraternities an
unfair rap.
I’m
not so sure. Some of my evidence is
hearsay, girls at SMU joking about what the letters SAE mean to them. Some is newspaper stories about SMU, such
as this one about the alleged assault in 2013 of a woman at a fraternity party.
Now, I know
what you are saying: “That’s anecdotal evidence.” In response, I say, that’s why academic
research exists. Research may not prove, but
it strengthens the claim that a correlation exists.
For example, Nicholas Syrett, assistant
professor of history at University of Northern Colorado, wrote a book based on
his research, The
Company He Keeps: A History of White College Fraternities. He did a longitudinal study that shows
over the
past 30 years psychologists, anthropologists, sociologists and educators have
continued to document alarming trends in pressure to have sex among fraternity
men, coerce it from unwilling women through the use of alcohol, and report
about it afterward to the assembled brotherhood.
Also, two studies in 2007 and 2009 published in the Journal for NASPA* reported that fraternity
members “are more likely than non-fraternity members to commit rape” and that "women
in sororities are 74 percent more likely to experience rape than other college
women.” Why? Because they socialize in a hostile environment for women.